Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$38K$31K$15K$29K$13K$4K$23K$26K$12K$6K$9K
Average discount rate40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%50%40%40%40%40%40%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers223222123333444
Avg download speed (Mbps)2,0001,5002,0002,0001,000300100100100100
Avg upload speed (Mbps)2,0001,5002,0002,0001,000300100100100100

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice
Telecomm Services$3K$2K
Internal Connections$12K$9K$24K$10K$19K$21K$8K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$26K$22K$15K$4K$4K$4K$4K$5K$4K$3K$7K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
The Barstow School$20K$40K$31K$22K$29K$15K$4K$23K$26K$12K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
The Barstow SchoolKansas City40%800402,0002,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
k12 ITC Inc$12K$9K$24K$10K$19K
Everfast Fiber Networks LLC$26K$22K$13K
ConvergeOne, Inc.$21K$8K
Consolidated Communications Enterprise Services, Inc.$2K$4K$4K$4K$4K$5K$4K
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company$5K
Savvis Communications$3K
Birch Telecom, Inc.$3K
Globalvision Systems, Inc.$2K
Kansas City Fiber Networks, L.P.$1K
ECCI $912

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.