Nativity Bvm School

Billed Entity 43793 · Mississippi

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$791$575$575$960$1K$1K$2K$1K$2K$2K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$643$1K$935$1K$1K$1K$2K$1K
Average discount rate60%40%40%50%50%50%50%60%60%50%50%50%50%50%80%40%50%40%40%40%40%50%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)111111111
Service providers11211133333333333335537
Avg download speed (Mbps)150150150150150150
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1515151515150

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice
Telecomm Services$2K$1K$2K$1K$833$828$820$1K$1K$643$1K$935$891$838$893$2K$1K
Internal Connections
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$791$575$575$960$1K$1K$540$398$416$337$300$346$187$451$150
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Nativity Bvm School$863$575$575$960$1K$1K$585$637$637

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Nativity Bvm SchoolBiloxi50%1715215030Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC$908$702$1K$1K$698$694$686$1K$1K$467$984$816$822$776$1K$1K$1K
Cable One, Inc.$960$1K$1K
Xfone USA, Inc$450$540$540$398$416$337$300
Verizon Business Global LLC$248$120$210$199$135$133$134$123$223$175$23$118$69$62$108$162$187
Cable One, Inc.$791$575$575
Datasync, Inc.$346$187$150
Cabletron Systems Sales & Services, Inc
Anixter Inc.
Insight Direct USA, Inc.
CDW, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.