East Glacier Park Sch Dist 50 A.K.A. East Glacier Park Elementary

Billed Entity 134938 · Montana

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$3K$4K$4K$4K$5K$5K$13K$6K$6K$7K$13K$4K$4K$4K$4K$4K$3K$3K$3K$4K
Average discount rate90%90%90%90%90%90%88%63%70%70%70%80%80%80%90%90%80%80%80%90%90%90%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers1111223223333444222231
Avg download speed (Mbps)50505050292929292929
Avg upload speed (Mbps)50505050262626252525

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$221$1K$1K
Telecomm Services$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K
Internal Connections$7K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$3K$4K$4K$4K$5K$5K$6K$6K$6K$6K$12K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$978$768$978$1K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
East Glacier Park Grade Sch$4K$4K$4K$4K$5K$5K$13K$6K$7K$7K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
East Glacier Park Grade SchE Glacier Pk90%41415050Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Ronan Telephone Company$4K$4K$5K$5K$5K$5K$11K
Qwest Corporation$807$864$691$912$691$2K$2K$3K$3K$3K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K
Siyeh Communications$3K$4K$4K$4K
NetDiverse LLC$7K
3 Rivers Telephone Cooperative, Inc.$424$1K$1K$978$768$978$1K
SCHOOLinSITES.com LLC$480$480$480$540$540
Qwest Communications Company, LLC$71$99$122$137$131$145$157
SLD Interim

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.