Deer Park School District 2 A.K.A. Deer Park Elementary

Billed Entity 135185 · Montana

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$9K$10K$8K$12K$12K$11K$12K$18K$1K$2K$1K$2K$2K$2K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K
Average discount rate80%80%65%60%60%60%60%60%70%50%60%60%61%62%45%50%52%52%50%50%
Schools & libraries (in this area)2222222222
Service providers22111112121111111122
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0004004004004004002525
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,00040040040040040025

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$599$774
Telecomm Services$1K$1K$1K$843$994$966$961$940$500
Internal Connections$5K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$9K$10K$8K$12K$12K$11K$12K$13K$1K$1K$420$432$446$446$324$377$348$376$367$616
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Deer Park 6-8 School$6K$5K$4K$6K$6K$6K$6K$9K$693$299
Deer Park School$6K$5K$4K$6K$6K$6K$6K$9K$693$2K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Deer Park 6-8 SchoolColumbia Falls60%52122,0002,000Rural
Deer Park SchoolColumbia Falls60%119262,0002,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Mountain Digital Enterprises, LLC$8K$12K$12K$11K$12K$13K$1K$1K
Vero Fiber Networks$9K$10K
CenturyTel of Montana, Inc.$599$1K$2K$2K$2K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$985
Univision Technologies Inc.$5K
Verizon Wireless$132

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.