Jordan Public Schools

Billed Entity 231193 · Montana

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$6K$7K$3K$4K$4K$4K$4K$2K$2K$5K$9K$8K$8K$9K$8K$8K$7K$7K$8K$5K$3K
Average discount rate70%80%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%50%60%67%61%66%68%65%66%66%66%69%65%
Schools & libraries (in this area)3333333333
Service providers111111111111111111111
Avg download speed (Mbps)217217133133133133133505050
Avg upload speed (Mbps)217217133133133133133252525

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$2K$3K
Telecomm Services$4K$8K$8K$8K$8K$7K$7K$7K$8K$5K$3K
Internal Connections
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$6K$7K$3K$4K$4K$4K$4K$2K$2K$3K$2K$704$590$638$618$326$297$326$193$71$200
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Garfield Co District High Sch$2K$2K$2K$3K$2K$2K$2K$810$810$3K
Jordan 6-8 School$2K$2K$2K$3K$2K$2K$2K$810$810$659
Jordan Elementary School$2K$2K$2K$3K$2K$2K$2K$810$810$659

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Garfield Co District High SchJordan70%6524500500Rural
Jordan 6-8 SchoolJordan70%3817500500Rural
Jordan Elementary SchoolJordan70%7836500500Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Mid-Rivers Telephone Cooperative, Inc.$6K$7K$3K$4K$4K$4K$4K$2K$2K$5K$9K$8K$8K$9K$8K$8K$7K$7K$8K$5K$3K

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.