Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$5K$4K$3K$23K$6K$28K$1K$1K$2K$2K$3K$3K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$3K$4K$4K$4K$4K$4K
Average discount rate50%50%40%50%50%50%50%25%30%40%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%
Schools & libraries (in this area)111111111
Service providers211232111222222222222122
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,000100,000200100100100
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,000351,0003520100100100

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$342$1K
Telecomm Services$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$869$869$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K
Internal Connections$2K$19K$26K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$4K$4K$3K$4K$4K$2K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$806$806$818$716$716$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services$2K

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Mercy High School$5K$4K$3K$25K$7K$28K$1K$2K$2K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Mercy High SchoolOmaha50%292851,0001,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Integrated Solutions$19K$2K$26K
Cox Nebraska Telcom, LLC$4K$4K$3K$4K$4K$2K$1K$1K$2K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$869$869$2K$2K$2K$4K
CoxCom, Inc. dba Cox Communications Omaha$1K$1K$1K$806$806$818$716$716$2K$2K$2K
Qwest Corporation fka US West Communications$2K$4K
Qwest Communications Corporation$2K
CDW Government LLC$2K
Telco Holdings, Inc dba Dial & Save
Voice & Data Systems, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.