Daniel J Gross High School

Billed Entity 78550 · Nebraska

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$5K$15K$23K$5K$1K$855$770$770$770$3K$3K
Average discount rate40%40%40%40%30%13%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%40%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)11111
Service providers131313212222222
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,000
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,000

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice
Telecomm Services$637$465$465$465$3K$3K
Internal Connections$9K$17K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$5K$6K$6K$5K$758$855$305$305$305
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Daniel J Gross High School$6K$15K$23K$5K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Daniel J Gross High SchoolBellevue50%409922,0002,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Cox Nebraska Telcom, LLC$5K$6K$6K$5K$637$465$465$465
CDW Government LLC$14K
Kidwell, Inc.$9K
Prime Communications, Inc.$3K
ALLTEL Communications, Inc.$2K$2K
CoxCom, Inc. dba Cox Communications Omaha$758$855$305$305$305
Qwest Communications Corporation$1K$1K
Computer Cable Connection, Inc.
Kidwell
Riverside Technologies, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.