Nashua Children'S Home

Billed Entity 16051491 · New Hampshire

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$9K$10K$10K$10K$10K$8K$3K$3K$4K$6K$8K$12K$18K$20K$16K$4K$2K
Average discount rate90%90%90%90%90%90%90%30%49%60%79%90%90%90%90%90%90%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers11111113545554534
Avg download speed (Mbps)38938938938938924119161622
Avg upload speed (Mbps)25252525252319161622

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$263$916$3K$5K
Telecomm Services$12K$18K$16K$12K$3K$2K
Internal Connections
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$9K$10K$10K$10K$10K$8K$3K$3K$3K$2K$3K$4K$4K$647$115
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Nashua Children'S Home$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$8K$3K$4K$7K$8K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Nashua Children'S HomeNashua90%46461,00040Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Comcast Business Communications$9K$10K$10K$10K$10K$8K$3K$3K$4K$3K$4K$5K$12K$10K$9K$4K$115
United States Cellular Corporation$2K$3K$6K$5K$9K$5K
CTC Communications Corp.$787$1K$1K$1K$1K
Sprint Spectrum, L.P.$2K
Windstream Communications, LLC$222$816
Northern New England Telephone Operations LLC$89
US Cellular Operating Co of Medford
Telephone & Network Technologies, Inc.
Computer Hut of N.E. Inc
Jive Communications, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.