Rutherford School District
Overview
| Indicator | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total E-Rate subsidies | — | $103K | $66K | $22K | $25K | $35K | $52K | $11K | $13K | $21K | $19K | $28K | $34K | $32K | $32K | $33K | — | — | — | — | — | — | $26K | $31K | — | $3K | $10K | $9K |
| Average discount rate | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 25% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 33% | — | — | — | — | 33% | 33% | 33% | — | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Schools & libraries (in this area) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Service providers | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 1 | — | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| Avg download speed (Mbps) | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 200 | 200 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Avg upload speed (Mbps) | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 200 | 200 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Subsidies by E-Rate service type
| Service type | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voice | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $8K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Telecomm Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $17K | $16K | $15K | $32K | $33K | — | — | — | — | — | — | $17K | $28K | — | — | $7K | $3K |
| Internal Connections | — | $88K | $52K | $12K | $15K | $25K | $42K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Data Transmission and/or Internet Access | — | $14K | $14K | $10K | $10K | $10K | $11K | $11K | $13K | $21K | $11K | $11K | $18K | $18K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $9K | $3K | — | $3K | $3K | $5K |
| Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Managed Internal Broadband Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution
| Recipient | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lincoln School | $3K | $21K | $15K | $4K | $5K | $11K | $2K | $2K | $4K | $4K |
| Pierrepont School | $3K | $21K | $15K | $4K | $5K | $11K | $2K | $2K | $4K | $4K |
| Rutherford High School | $3K | $21K | $15K | $4K | $5K | $3K | $23K | $2K | $4K | $4K |
| Union School | $3K | $21K | $15K | $4K | $5K | $3K | $23K | $2K | $4K | $4K |
| Washington School | $3K | $21K | $15K | $4K | $5K | $11K | $2K | $2K | $4K | $4K |
Recipient demographics
| Recipient | City | Discount Rate | Students | NSLP | Down Mbps | Up Mbps | Urban/Rural |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lincoln School | Rutherford | 40% | 500 | 37 | 10,000 | 10,000 | Urban |
| Pierrepont School | Rutherford | 40% | 569 | 36 | 10,000 | 10,000 | Urban |
| Rutherford High School | Rutherford | 40% | 722 | 28 | 10,000 | 10,000 | Urban |
| Union School | Rutherford | 40% | 399 | 27 | 10,000 | 10,000 | Urban |
| Washington School | Rutherford | 40% | 349 | 23 | 10,000 | 10,000 | Urban |
Subsidies by service provider (top 10)
| Service provider | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NetCarrier Telecom, Inc. | — | $14K | $14K | $10K | $10K | $10K | $11K | $11K | $13K | $21K | $14K | $17K | $24K | $22K | $23K | $24K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Computer Design & Integration LLC | — | $88K | $52K | $12K | $15K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Verizon- New Jersey, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $4K | $8K | $7K | $7K | $7K | $7K | — | — | — | — | — | — | $23K | $31K | — | $3K | $10K | $5K |
| Promedia Technology Services | — | — | — | — | — | $25K | $42K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1K | $3K | $3K | $3K | $2K | $2K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PSINet, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $3K |
| Verizon Network Integration | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $3K | — | — | — | — | — |
| Apple Computer, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Arctiq US, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.