National Park School District

Billed Entity 123243 · New Jersey

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$5K$19K$2K$2K$1K$1K$2K$2K$2K$27K$4K$4K$4K$3K$3K$2K$3K$2K$5K
Average discount rate80%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%47%53%60%80%60%60%50%50%50%50%40%60%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers341111111333111123334
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000300300300300
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000300300300300

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$1K$2K
Telecomm Services$3K$4K$3K$3K$2K$3K$2K$5K
Internal Connections$4K$17K$24K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$413$1K$2K$2K$1K$1K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$1K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$603$397
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
National Park Elem School$7K$19K$2K$2K$1K$1K$2K$2K$2K$27K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
National Park Elem SchoolNational Park80%3181601,0001,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
XTel Communications, Inc.$1K$2K$3K$4K$3K$3K$2K$3K$2K$3K
NWN Corporation-Raleigh$24K
Relcomm, Inc.$13K
Business Automation Technologies, Inc.$2K$2K$2K$2K$1K
Verizon Online LLC$413$1K$2K$2K$1K$1K
CDW Government LLC$4K$3K
Turn-key Technologies, Inc.$3K
Comcast Business Communications$1K$1K
Verizon New Jersey Inc$2K
MCI Communications Corporation

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.