Merchantville School District

Billed Entity 123333 · New Jersey

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$7K$7K$8K$37K$11K$6K$11K$20K$8K$7K$4K$5K$1K$5K$5K$7K$5K
Average discount rate60%50%55%60%60%60%60%60%60%33%37%60%60%50%50%50%60%50%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers111123112223323444
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,000200200167100100
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,000200200167100100

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$834$1K
Telecomm Services$3K$3K$86$4K$4K$6K$4K
Internal Connections$28K$5K$13K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$7K$7K$8K$8K$6K$6K$11K$7K$7K$6K$1K$2K$1K$1K$1K$821$1K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Merchantville Elementary School$8K$7K$7K$8K$37K$11K$6K$19K$34K$8K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Merchantville Elementary SchoolMerchantville60%3941661,0001,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Comcast Business Communications$7K$7K$8K$8K$6K$6K$11K$7K$8K$7K$2K$3K
Core BTS, Inc.$28K$5K
XTel Communications, Inc.$86$4K$4K$5K$4K
Dyntek Services, Inc.$13K
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC$1K$2K$1K$1K$1K$821$1K
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$81$668$700
Verizon New Jersey Inc$955$125
AT&T Corporation$356$304
Avaya
CDW Government LLC

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.