Bais Faiga School For Girls (Lakewood Cheder School)

Billed Entity 16057828 · New Jersey

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$59K$36K$41K$78K$331K
Average discount rate90%85%68%65%76%80%82%90%90%90%90%
Schools & libraries (in this area)111
Service providers11233257877
Avg download speed (Mbps)156156156
Avg upload speed (Mbps)156156156

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$7K
Telecomm Services$36K$13K$6K
Internal Connections$50K$298K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$52K$135
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$27K$29K$27K
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Bais Faiga School For Girls (Lakewood Cheder School)$50K$64K$16K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Bais Faiga School For Girls (Lakewood Cheder School)Lakewood90%2,9312,9311,0001,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Advanced Database Management$27K$78K$325K
Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc$59K$35K$13K$5K
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$1K
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC - CONSOLIDATED$810
OV LLC$135
Verizon New Jersey Inc
PNG Telecommunications, Inc.
Sprint Communications Co. L.P.
Dynalink Communications, Inc.
Encore Cellular Corp

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.