Lord Stirling School

Billed Entity 220689 · New Jersey

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$1K$2K$3K$4K$4K$9K$10K$11K$18K$24K$16K$22K$14K$10K$47K$158K
Average discount rate90%90%90%90%37%50%63%79%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111
Service providers11112223555546644342
Avg download speed (Mbps)10010010010010100100
Avg upload speed (Mbps)10010010010010100100

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$520$2K$3K
Telecomm Services$8K$8K$9K$16K$22K$13K$10K$6K$5K
Internal Connections$4K$10K$3K$47K$158K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$1K$1K$1K$2K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$4K$5K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$960$960$1K$1K$839
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Lord Stirling School$8K$8K$8K$8K$6K$19K$8K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Lord Stirling SchoolBasking Ridge90%4232100100Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Ed-Tec, Inc.$158K
Verizon New Jersey Inc$1K$2K$3K$4K$7K$8K$7K$8K$13K$4K$1K$1K
ProMedia Technology Services, Inc.$10K$47K
ATX Telecommunications Services, Ltd.$6K$9K$9K$9K$9K$9K
Paradigm Pioneers, Inc.$4K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$3K
RFP Solutions, Inc.$960$960$1K$1K$839
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$1K$2K
Sprint Communications Co. L.P.$130$393$641$772
Sprint Spectrum, L.P.$904
AT&T Corp.$390

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.