Red Bank Charter School

Billed Entity 223515 · New Jersey

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$11K$2K$2K$3K$3K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$3K$3K$3K$4K$5K$3K
Average discount rate80%60%60%80%80%60%60%60%60%40%50%50%60%60%60%50%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers2111122112224445
Avg download speed (Mbps)17517517550505050505050
Avg upload speed (Mbps)17517517550505050505050

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$806$2K
Telecomm Services$2K$2K$3K$4K$2K
Internal Connections$8K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$3K$2K$2K$3K$3K$2K$2K$2K$2K$1K$1K$848$950$1K$1K$834
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Red Bank Charter School$11K$2K$2K$3K$3K$8K$4K$2K$2K$2K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Red Bank Charter SchoolRed Bank80%182102300300Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC$3K$2K$2K$3K$3K$2K$2K$2K$2K$1K$1K$848$950$837$761$634
Verizon New Jersey Inc$806$2K$2K$2K$3K$2K$2K
CMS Communications, Inc.$8K
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$540$1K
Seacliff associates, LLC$240$240$200
SHI International Corpo.
SLD Interim

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.