School Of Dreams Academy

Billed Entity 16056673 · New Mexico

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$107K$73K$37K$42K$38K$15K$19K$18K$2K
Average discount rate88%86%89%90%90%90%60%50%30%50%70%25%25%25%48%
Schools & libraries (in this area)111111111
Service providers223111122222223
Avg download speed (Mbps)20,00020,00015,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,00040
Avg upload speed (Mbps)20,00020,00010,5001,0001,0001,0001,0001,00040

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$291$2K
Telecomm Services$3K$395
Internal Connections$53K$13K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$54K$59K$37K$42K$38K$15K$17K$15K$2K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
School Of Dreams Academy$112K$73K$59K$67K$67K$64K$43K$38K$16K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
School Of Dreams AcademyLos Lunas90%4574575,0005,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
CenturyLink Level 3 Communications, LLC$54K$59K$37K
Qwest Communications Company, LLC$42K$38K$15K$17K$15K$2K
Poweron Technology Services$53K
Decision Tree Inc.$13K
Qwest Corporation$291$2K$3K$395
Desert Communications, Inc.
Education Technologies, Inc.
SLD INTERIM

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.