Cottonwood Classical Preparatory School

Billed Entity 16082886 · New Mexico

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$8K$13K$15K$35K$38K$23K$14K$11K$47K$8K$10K
Average discount rate65%80%80%80%80%60%40%40%40%40%32%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers21122321222
Avg download speed (Mbps)2,0002,0002,0002,0002,0001,0001,0001,000100100
Avg upload speed (Mbps)2,0002,0002,0002,0002,0001,0001,0001,000100100

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$2K
Telecomm Services
Internal Connections$20K$23K$3K$3K$39K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$8K$13K$15K$15K$15K$21K$11K$11K$7K$8K$8K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$32$622
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Cottonwood Classical Preparatory School$11K$13K$15K$35K$38K$33K$14K$11K$47K$8K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Cottonwood Classical Preparatory SchoolAlbuquerque50%9171815,0005,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Harmonix Technologies Inc$20K$23K$1K$3K$40K
EM3 Networks LLC$8K$13K$15K$15K$15K
Airespring, Inc.$21K$11K$11K
Windstream Communications, LLC$7K$8K$10K
CamNet, Inc.$1K
Harris Technology Services, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.