Taos Charter School

Billed Entity 226976 · New Mexico

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$8K$4K$4K$18K$25K$7K$6K$11K$20K$15K$13K$19K$9K$3K$7K
Average discount rate80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%60%67%70%80%80%80%80%80%80%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers22122322332233222
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0009890752530
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0009890751630

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$569$1K
Telecomm Services$3K$3K$3K$2K$3K$2K
Internal Connections$8K$10K$18K$12K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$4K$4K$8K$7K$7K$6K$10K$7K$12K$10K$17K$7K$5K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Taos Charter School$12K$4K$4K$4K$18K$25K$10K$6K$12K$22K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Taos Charter SchoolTaos80%2151401,0001,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Taosnet, LLC$4K$4K$8K$6K$6K$6K$9K$7K$12K$10K$10K
Qwest Communications Corporation$6K$7K$1K$5K
SHI International Corpo.$18K
Qwest Corporation$569$1K$3K$3K$3K$2K$1K$2K
Valcom Salt Lake City, LC$12K
CamNet, Inc.$10K
Questivity Inc$8K
Kit Carson Electric Cooperative, Inc$2K$1K
CenturyLink CenturyTel of the Southwest (New Mexico)$576
Optimus Technology Company

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.