Dzilth-Na-O-Dith-Hle School

Billed Entity 99238 · New Mexico

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$49K$65K$58K$60K$60K$59K$65K$51K$49K$63K$72K$65K$27K$59K$30K$18K$198K
Average discount rate90%88%90%90%90%90%88%37%50%63%77%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers1111112344756745464
Avg download speed (Mbps)20020020010010010025251512
Avg upload speed (Mbps)20020020010010010025251512

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$2K$770$8K$13K
Telecomm Services$8K$23K$25K
Internal Connections$7K$16K$198K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$49K$58K$58K$60K$60K$59K$49K$49K$49K$55K$59K$57K$4K$7K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$27K$30K$18K
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Dzilth-Na-O-Dith-Hle School$58K$65K$58K$60K$60K$60K$65K$51K$54K$63K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Dzilth-Na-O-Dith-Hle SchoolBloomfield85%151151200200Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Smith Bagley, Inc.$49K$65K$58K$60K$60K$59K$49K$49K$49K$54K$59K$54K
Harris Technology Services, Inc.$8K$198K
Systms of NY, Inc.$13K$30K$10K
Sacred Wind Communications, Inc.$1K$7K$9K$11K$13K
AT&T Mobility$3K$8K$8K$13K
CamNet, Inc.$16K
EQ CONSULTING, INC.$13K
Verizon Business Global LLC$108$189$416$3K$4K
AT&T Corp$706$662$2K$1K$3K
Intrafinity Inc$2K$2K

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.