Catherine Laboure Speciall Ed Program

Billed Entity 11962 · New York — New York City & Long Island

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$7K$7K$16K$15K$13K$24K$25K$63K$26K$26K$34K$16K$16K$33K$4K$4K
Average discount rate90%70%79%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%50%50%50%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)11
Service providers123333333333333321
Avg download speed (Mbps)300150
Avg upload speed (Mbps)20150

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice
Telecomm Services$3K$815$4K$4K$3K$4K$4K$4K$4K$1K$900$497
Internal Connections$30K$8K$26K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$7K$7K$9K$12K$12K$12K$9K$12K$6K$6K$6K$7K$6K$3K$3K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$7K$12K$12K$16K$16K$16K$16K$12K$5K
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Catherine Laboure Speciall Ed Program$7K$8K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Catherine Laboure Speciall Ed ProgramBrooklyn90%655830020Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Autoexec Computer Systems Inc.$7K$7K$16K$12K$12K$24K$21K$59K$22K$22K$30K$12K$12K$32K$3K$3K
Verizon- New York Inc.$3K$3K$3K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$900$347
Verizon Wireless fka Cellco Partnership$148$815$798$1K$1K$1K$1K$2K$2K$1K
AT&T Corp.$150
Impresso, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.