Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$30K$8K$8K$8K$8K$9K$8K$24K$8K$7K$10K$10K$11K$8K$8K$8K$6K$5K$6K$4K$4K$4K$7K$7K$108$1K$563
Average discount rate88%90%90%90%90%90%80%80%40%53%67%80%80%80%80%80%60%60%60%50%50%50%50%50%60%60%50%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers211111123333333333432222133
Avg download speed (Mbps)1001001001001008080808080
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1001001001001008080808080

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$360$1K$2K
Telecomm Services$2K$2K$2K$2K$3K$2K$2K$2K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$108$1K$563
Internal Connections$26K$16K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$4K$8K$8K$8K$8K$9K$8K$8K$8K$6K$8K$8K$8K$6K$6K$5K$4K$3K$4K$3K$3K$3K$6K$6K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
St William School$34K$8K$8K$8K$8K$9K$8K$24K$9K$9K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
St William SchoolCincinnati90%24822910,00010,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Hamilton Clermont Cooperative Association of Boards of Ed$4K$8K$8K$8K$8K$9K$8K$8K$8K$6K$8K$8K$8K$6K$6K$5K$4K$3K$4K$3K$3K$3K$6K$6K
Cincinnati Bell Telephone LLC (OH)$360$1K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$3K$2K$2K$2K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$108$1K$563
NKOL, LLC$26K
Fuller Computer Solutions$16K
Cincinnati Bell Any Distance Inc.$90$96$95$96$97$175$131$118$85$75
Apple Computer, Inc.
Bradbern Network Services, Inc.
Edline LLC

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.