Mother Of Mercy High School

Billed Entity 49762 · Ohio

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$6K$5K$11K$7K$13K$13K$5K$9K$9K$8K$9K$6K$6K$5K$5K$8K$3K
Average discount rate50%40%28%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)11
Service providers1154555554443333444
Avg download speed (Mbps)200200
Avg upload speed (Mbps)200200

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice
Telecomm Services$6K$7K$6K$7K$6K$6K$6K$3K$3K$3K$3K
Internal Connections$5K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$6K$5K$5K$7K$7K$6K$5K$2K$3K$3K$3K$3K$3K$5K$5K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Mother Of Mercy High School$8K$6K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Mother Of Mercy High SchoolCincinnati50%491131200200Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Hamilton Clermont Cooperative Association of Boards of Ed$6K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$3K$3K$3K$3K$3K$3K$5K$5K
Cincinnati Bell Telephone LLC (OH)$4K$5K$5K$6K$5K$5K$5K$3K$3K$2K$3K
iModules Software, Inc$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K
Cincinnati Bell Wireless- LLC$2K$1K$811$696$356$696
Bradbern Network Services, Inc.$5K
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$1K$91$167
Cincinnati Bell Any Distance Inc.$187$185$176$193$240$139$210
MCI Communications Corporation$607$422
Cincinnati Bell Technology Solutions

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.