Moore Norman Technology Center

Billed Entity 139800 · Oklahoma

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$10K$34K$12K$30K$12K$26K$13K$46K$16K$23K$23K$24K$27K$25K$21K$21K$19K
Average discount rate60%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%33%47%60%60%60%50%50%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers22122223133343332
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000750500500500
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000750500500500

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$3K$3K
Telecomm Services$8K$11K$8K$7K$7K$6K
Internal Connections$23K$18K$13K$35K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$10K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$13K$11K$16K$20K$20K$16K$17K$17K$14K$14K$14K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Mntc-Franklin Road Campus$44K$35K$12K$32K$12K$26K$72K$46K$17K$23K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Mntc-Franklin Road CampusNorman50%9991821,0001,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
OneNet (Oklahoma State Regents)$10K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$13K$11K$16K$20K$20K$16K$17K$17K$14K$14K$14K
Beasley Technology, Inc.$13K$30K
High Point Networks, LLC$23K$18K
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company$1K$4K$7K$8K$7K$7K$6K
Cox Oklahoma Telcom, LLC$1K$3K$5K$3K
Peak Methods, Inc$4K
AT&T Corp.$214$632$698
Telecomp Computer Services, Inc

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.