Miami Public Library

Billed Entity 140143 · Oklahoma

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$8K$9K$9K$9K$9K$10K$10K$11K$10K$10K$11K$23K$23K$2K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$4K$4K$4K$5K$5K
Average discount rate80%80%80%80%80%80%80%90%80%80%80%90%90%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%75%75%75%74%70%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers1111111113112111111121111245
Avg download speed (Mbps)200100100200200100978210090
Avg upload speed (Mbps)200100100200200100979910090

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice
Telecomm Services$5K$2K
Internal Connections$3K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$8K$9K$9K$9K$9K$10K$10K$11K$10K$10K$11K$23K$23K$2K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$4K$4K$4K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Miami Public Library$9K$9K$9K$9K$9K$10K$10K$11K$10K$34K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Miami Public LibraryMiami80%200200Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
OneNet (Oklahoma State Regents)$11K$23K$23K$2K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$4K$4K$4K$4K
Northeast Rural Services, Inc.$8K$9K$9K$9K$9K$10K$10K$11K$10K$10K
Chickasaw Tel. Co.$3K
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company$992$1K
MCI LLC & Subsidiaries$58$224
AT&T Corp.$280
CDW Computer Centers, Inc.$265
SKC Communication Products, Inc
Wyandotte Net Tel.
Peak Methods, Inc

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.