Checotah Indep School Dist 19
Overview
| Indicator | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total E-Rate subsidies | $61K | $147K | $72K | $196K | $83K | $105K | $107K | $95K | $55K | $46K | $235K | $64K | $75K | $66K | $57K | $417K | $288K | $33K | $78K | $26K | $187K | $29K | $27K | $17K | $8K | $28K | $9K | — |
| Average discount rate | 90% | 88% | 80% | 80% | 80% | 84% | 88% | 80% | 61% | 63% | 78% | 90% | 87% | 87% | 85% | 87% | 85% | 81% | 82% | 81% | 84% | 86% | 83% | 86% | 85% | 83% | 90% | — |
| Schools & libraries (in this area) | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Service providers | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 | — |
| Avg download speed (Mbps) | 7,500 | 7,500 | 7,500 | 7,500 | 7,500 | 7,500 | 7,500 | 5,333 | 1,000 | 220 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Avg upload speed (Mbps) | 7,500 | 7,500 | 7,500 | 7,500 | 7,500 | 7,500 | 7,500 | 5,333 | 1,000 | 220 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Subsidies by E-Rate service type
| Service type | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voice | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $8K | $12K | $22K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Telecomm Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $38K | $39K | $33K | $37K | $38K | $31K | $23K | $19K | $16K | $29K | $20K | $19K | $9K | — | $20K | — | — |
| Internal Connections | — | $55K | — | $116K | — | $10K | — | — | $7K | — | $177K | — | — | — | — | $324K | $193K | — | — | — | $63K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Data Transmission and/or Internet Access | $61K | $92K | $72K | $80K | $80K | $95K | $107K | $95K | $40K | $34K | $37K | $26K | $35K | $33K | $21K | $16K | $11K | $10K | $10K | $10K | $10K | $8K | $8K | $8K | $8K | $8K | $9K | — |
| Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections | — | — | — | — | $3K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $38K | $53K | — | $49K | — | $86K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Managed Internal Broadband Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution
| Recipient | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Checotah High School | $20K | $38K | $23K | $55K | $25K | $26K | $27K | $30K | $13K | $46K |
| Checotah Intermediate School | $20K | $38K | $23K | $55K | $25K | $26K | $27K | $30K | $13K | $12K |
| Checotah Middle School | $20K | $38K | $23K | $55K | $25K | $26K | $27K | $30K | $13K | $12K |
| Marshall Elementary School | $20K | $38K | $23K | $55K | $25K | $26K | $27K | $31K | $19K | $12K |
Recipient demographics
| Recipient | City | Discount Rate | Students | NSLP | Down Mbps | Up Mbps | Urban/Rural |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Checotah High School | Checotah | 80% | 346 | 162 | 10,000 | 10,000 | Rural |
| Checotah Intermediate School | Checotah | 80% | 304 | 176 | 10,000 | 10,000 | Rural |
| Checotah Middle School | Checotah | 80% | 301 | 166 | 10,000 | 10,000 | Rural |
| Marshall Elementary School | Checotah | 80% | 407 | 276 | 10,000 | 10,000 | Rural |
Subsidies by service provider (top 10)
| Service provider | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| West Iowa Technology,LLC | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $7K | — | $177K | — | — | — | — | $362K | $193K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dobson Technologies, Transport and Telecom Solutions, LLC | $61K | $92K | $72K | $80K | $80K | $95K | $107K | $95K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| OneNet (Oklahoma State Regents) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $40K | $34K | $37K | $26K | $35K | $33K | $21K | $16K | $11K | $10K | $10K | $10K | $10K | $8K | $8K | $8K | $8K | $8K | $9K | — |
| Conxts Technology Solutions | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $49K | — | $148K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Windstream Communications, LLC | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $6K | $7K | $14K | $18K | $17K | $15K | $13K | $13K | $12K | $10K | $8K | $1K | $13K | $13K | $13K | $9K | — | $13K | — | — |
| Telecomp Computer Services, Inc | — | $55K | — | $116K | $3K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AT&T Corporation | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1K | $3K | $6K | $8K | $8K | $6K | $7K | $6K | $4K | $4K | $3K | $7K | $7K | $7K | — | — | $7K | — | — |
| ATT Mobility | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $17K | $18K | $13K | $8K | $7K | $12K | $9K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Peak Methods, Inc | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $53K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| United States Cellular Corporation | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $2K | $3K | $5K | $14K | $15K | $10K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.