Fairfax Public Library

Billed Entity 140279 · Oklahoma

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$5K$6K$7K$37K$40K$37K$37K$33K$38K$27K$31K$21K$14K$7K$7K$7K$8K$6K$6K$6K$6K$5K$4K$2K$3K$3K
Average discount rate80%80%80%90%88%90%90%80%70%70%83%90%80%90%90%90%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%87%80%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers111121112232222343342333332
Avg download speed (Mbps)2002002001001001001001006020
Avg upload speed (Mbps)2002002001001001001001006020

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$369$646$880
Telecomm Services$1K$880$1K$1K$2K$2K$1K$1K$1K$986$1K$1K$698$760
Internal Connections$3K$3K$2K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$5K$6K$7K$37K$37K$37K$37K$33K$38K$27K$27K$20K$13K$6K$6K$6K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$4K$3K$2K$2K$2K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Fairfax Public Library$6K$6K$7K$37K$40K$37K$37K$33K$38K$27K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Fairfax Public LibraryFairfax80%200200Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
OneNet (Oklahoma State Regents)$5K$6K$7K$37K$37K$37K$37K$33K$38K$27K$27K$20K$13K$6K$6K$6K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$4K$3K$2K$2K$2K
Windstream Communications, LLC$369$646$880$1K$880$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$986$1K$1K$698$760
Chickasaw Telecom, Inc.$3K$3K$2K
AT&T Corporation$434$370$330$314
GTE Midwest Incorporated

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.