Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$22K$32K$30K$41K$35K$38K$34K$45K$48K
Average discount rate88%90%88%89%90%89%88%59%60%
Schools & libraries (in this area)4444444333
Service providers212212232
Avg download speed (Mbps)5005003001001001001005050
Avg upload speed (Mbps)5005003001001001001005050

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$2K$5K
Telecomm Services
Internal Connections$22K$2K$6K$3K$8K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$32K$28K$35K$35K$35K$27K$42K$42K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Tulsa Educare I -Kendall Whittier$13K$8K$8K$10K$9K$9K$15K$20K$16K$11K
Tulsa Educare Ii-Hawthorne$13K$8K$8K$10K$9K$9K$7K$5K$16K$11K
Tulsa Educare Iii -Macarthur$13K$8K$8K$10K$9K$12K$7K$20K$16K$11K
Tulsa Educare Iv - Celia Clinton$13K$8K$8K$10K$8K$8K$20K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Tulsa Educare I -Kendall WhittierTulsa90%8481500500Urban
Tulsa Educare Ii-HawthorneTulsa90%4848500500Urban
Tulsa Educare Iii -MacarthurTulsa90%5855500500Urban
Tulsa Educare Iv - Celia ClintonTulsa90%4743500500Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
CoxCom, Inc. dba Cox Communications Oklahoma City$35K$35K$35K$27K$42K$42K
Cox Oklahoma Telcom, LLC$32K$28K$2K$5K
SHI International Corpo.$22K$2K
NetLink Solutions, LLC$8K
SKYRIDER COMMUNICATIONS LLC$6K
Advanced Networks of Texas$3K

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.