Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$6K$7K$7K$12K$12K$12K$12K$10K$12K$13K$28K$19K$19K$11K$5K$5K$9K$7K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$2K$2K$1K
Average discount rate80%80%80%90%90%90%90%80%50%60%73%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%60%60%60%63%43%61%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers11111111222111223222222222
Avg download speed (Mbps)1001001001001001009595100100
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1001001001001001009595100100

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$75$146$215
Telecomm Services$277$260$284$113$541$915$897$851$861$810$854$893$940$863
Internal Connections$7K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$6K$7K$7K$12K$12K$12K$12K$10K$12K$13K$21K$19K$19K$11K$5K$5K$5K$6K$528$528$232$369$546$2K$1K$1K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$3K
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Catoosa Library$7K$7K$7K$12K$12K$12K$12K$10K$12K$13K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Catoosa LibraryCatoosa90%100100Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
OneNet (Oklahoma State Regents)$6K$7K$7K$12K$12K$12K$12K$10K$12K$13K$5K$5K$6K$2K$1K$1K
Cox Communications, Inc.$146$21K$19K$11K$5K
Cox Oklahoma Telcom, LLC$75$19K
Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P.$541$915$897$851$861$810$854$893$940$863
Northeast Rural Services, Inc.$7K
General Office Systems, INC.$3K
Southwestern Bell Internet Services, Inc.$528$528$232$369$546

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.