Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$6K$3K$5K$5K$3K$2K$1K$1K$1K$4K$9K$9K$9K$9K
Average discount rate40%20%40%40%30%40%40%40%40%24%40%40%40%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)111111111
Service providers21111111146777
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,00010010010025
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,00020202025

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$3K
Telecomm Services$7K$8K$7K$7K
Internal Connections$1K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$4K$3K$5K$5K$3K$2K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$2K$2K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Monte Cassino School$54K$3K$5K$5K$3K$2K$1K$2K$1K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Monte Cassino SchoolTulsa40%828101,0001,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Cox Oklahoma Telcom, LLC$4K$3K$5K$5K$3K$4K$4K$4K$4K
CoxCom, Inc. dba Cox Communications Oklahoma City$2K$1K$1K$1K$3K$288$248$561$561
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company$776$2K$2K$2K$2K
WhippleHill Communications, Inc.$1K$1K$1K$1K
AT&T Mobility$58$1K$1K$747$528
Sprint Spectrum, L.P.$552$950
Chickasaw Telecom, Inc.$1K
SBC Long Distance, LLC.$62$160$160$162$290

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.