Wickliffe Elementary School

Billed Entity 84827 · Oklahoma

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$11K$11K$13K$8K$22K$19K$10K$12K$13K$18K$15K$11K$9K$9K$9K$8K$9K$10K$10K$13K$12K$12K$12K$32K$19K$11K
Average discount rate88%90%88%88%88%88%90%68%63%77%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%
Schools & libraries (in this area)11111111
Service providers212222111223211111111111111
Avg download speed (Mbps)50050032515015015015010
Avg upload speed (Mbps)50050032515015015015010

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$757$1K$2K
Telecomm Services$9K$7K$6K$4K$4K$4K$3K$3K$4K$4K$6K$5K$5K$5K$5K$8K$9K
Internal Connections$3K$1K$15K$12K$19K$3K$143
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$11K$11K$11K$7K$7K$7K$9K$10K$11K$9K$8K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$6K$6K$6K$7K$7K$7K$8K$9K$1K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Wickliffe Elementary School$12K$14K$17K$8K$22K$19K$10K$22K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Wickliffe Elementary SchoolSalina90%114114500500Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Salina-Spavinaw Telephone Co., Inc.$11K$11K$11K$7K$7K$7K$10K$12K$13K$18K$15K$9K$9K$9K$9K$8K$9K$10K$10K$13K$12K$12K$12K$32K$19K$11K
Nobel Systems, Inc.$1K$15K
SkyRider Communications, Inc.$12K
Peak Methods, Inc$3K
AT&T Mobility$2K
Twotrees Technologies
Bits N Bytes Computer Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.