New Hope Christian School

Billed Entity 114298 · Oregon

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$825$900$720$762$960$960$960$960$5K$965$4K$5K$5K$4K$3K$5K
Average discount rate50%50%40%40%50%50%50%50%50%37%37%70%70%70%70%70%50%70%70%80%80%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers111121122433444434555
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,00075757575757530090
Avg upload speed (Mbps)3535777777711

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$485
Telecomm Services$3K$3K$3K$3K$2K$4K
Internal Connections$4K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$825$900$720$762$960$960$960$960$960$480$924$2K$2K$2K$1K$2K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
New Hope Christian School$900$900$1K$1K$1K$1K$960$960$5K$2K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
New Hope Christian SchoolGrants Pass50%225191,0001,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Integra Telecom of Oregon, Inc.$236$1K$2K$2K$2K$1K
Charter Communications Operating, LLC$825$900$720$762$960$960$960$960
United States Cellular Corporation$249$2K$2K$1K$1K$546
Charter Communications$960$480$924$924$924$924$693
10D Telecom, Inc.$4K
Edline, LLC$984$950$694$694
Qwest Corporation fka US West Communications, Inc.$2K
Bowdoin Consulting$2K
MCI Communications Corporation$864
United States Cellular$576

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.