Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$4K$3K$4K$3K$7K$4K$1K$5K$7K$9K$7K$3K$3K$10K$3K$3K$3K
Average discount rate90%80%80%80%70%70%70%70%46%53%67%83%80%80%75%78%80%75%75%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111244
Service providers1111112222333224211
Avg download speed (Mbps)100100100100100100100513451
Avg upload speed (Mbps)100100100100100100100513451

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$520$1K$3K
Telecomm Services$4K$4K$3K$3K$3K$3K$3K$3K
Internal Connections$4K$8K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$4K$3K$4K$3K$3K$4K$951$4K$4K$5K$4K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Christmas Valley Branch Library$462$655$283
Lakeview Main Library$4K$4K$3K$4K$3K$3K$7K$3K$4K$12K
Paisley Branch Library$109$210
Silver Lake Branch Library$817$672

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Christmas Valley Branch LibraryChristmas Valley70%22Rural
Lakeview Main LibraryLakeview90%100100Rural
Paisley Branch LibraryPaisley20%Rural
Silver Lake Branch LibrarySilver Lake20%22Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Hunter Construction, Inc.$4K$3K$4K$3K$3K$3K$203$4K$6K$7K$6K
CenturyTel of Oregon, Inc.$452$1K$905$970$2K$2K$3K$3K$3K$3K$3K$3K
Eastern Oregon Technology$8K
AccTech Solutions Inc$4K
Internet Extension Computer and Network Services LLC

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.