Lincoln City Tech Charter School

Billed Entity 211302 · Oregon

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$8K$8K$2K$3K$4K$3K$4K$6K$7K$6K$6K$5K$4K$6K$5K$5K$2K$3K
Average discount rate90%90%80%50%60%70%72%80%90%90%90%60%70%70%60%70%60%80%
Schools & libraries (in this area)111111
Service providers224433333334433332
Avg download speed (Mbps)75756501606055
Avg upload speed (Mbps)75755101394

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$350$925$576$1K
Telecomm Services$3K$4K$3K$3K$4K$4K$3K$3K$3K$1K$2K
Internal Connections
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$8K$8K$2K$3K$3K$3K$3K$3K$3K$2K$3K$2K$2K$2K$1K$1K$768
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Lincoln City Tech Charter School$8K$8K$2K$4K$5K$5K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Lincoln City Tech Charter SchoolLincoln City90%4840100100Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Charter Communications$2K$3K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$1K$2K$2K$1K$1K$768
Sprint - Local Telephone Division$744$918$1K$1K$1K$1K$2K$2K$3K$4K$3K$3K
Charter Communications Operating, LLC$5K$5K$2K$2K
ATT Mobility$128$421$576$184$2K$3K$2K$2K$2K$932
WAVEDIVISION HOLDINGS, LLC$3K$3K
Sprint Communications Company L.P. (Long Distance Division)$284$358$378$307$345$1K$2K
CenturyLink Qwest Communications Company, LLC
Apple Computer, Inc

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.