Blessed Sacrament School

Billed Entity 3092 · Rhode Island

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$13K$4K$5K$8K$4K$5K$27K$3K$2K$3K$3K$5K$5K$2K$1K$1K$1K$1K$831$1K$2K$2K$2K
Average discount rate80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%50%60%50%80%80%80%60%50%50%50%40%40%40%40%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers21221121222221111122235
Avg download speed (Mbps)100505050505050151515
Avg upload speed (Mbps)100505050505050151515

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$912
Telecomm Services$2K$2K$2K$1K$1K$1K$1K$831$937$927$860
Internal Connections$9K$3K$22K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$5K$4K$4K$4K$4K$5K$5K$3K$2K$3K$2K$4K$4K$1K$1K$1K$858
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$680
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Blessed Sacrament School$21K$7K$12K$12K$9K$9K$31K$6K$7K$7K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Blessed Sacrament SchoolProvidence80%1721011,0001,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Rhode Island Network for Educational Technology, Inc.$5K$4K$4K$4K$4K$5K$5K$3K$2K$3K$2K$4K$4K$1K$1K$1K$858
The Apex Technology Group, Inc.$9K$680$3K$22K
Choice One Communications of Rhode Island, Inc.$912$2K$2K$2K$1K$1K$1K$1K$831$937$927$860
Electro Standards Laboratory, Inc.
Hewlett-Packard Co Customer Support Bus Center
Digital Support Corporation
Cox Rhode Island Telcom, LLC

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.