Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$2K$3K$18K$9K$9K$8K$7K$9K$10K$13K$11K$10K$66K$16K$17K$17K$18K$18K$10K$10K$48K
Average discount rate67%56%88%90%90%90%90%50%50%69%79%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers22211212343344333344357
Avg download speed (Mbps)1001001001001005510101010
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1001001001001005510101010

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$151$1K$2K
Telecomm Services$11K$10K$11K$12K$13K$13K$12K$11K$10K$10K$7K
Internal Connections$9K$51K$39K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$2K$3K$9K$9K$9K$8K$7K$8K$9K$8K$2K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$3K$4K$4K$4K$4K$5K$7K
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Amikids Piedmont$3K$6K$18K$14K$14K$13K$9K$9K$10K$14K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Amikids PiedmontClinton85%1616100100Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
ITC Deltacom Communications, Inc$8K$7K$8K$9K$9K$10K$9K$8K$7K$7K$2K
Grand Computers, LLC$9K$3K$51K$4K$4K
Network Innovations, LLC$2K$3K$9K$9K$9K$8K
Multimedia Communications Services Corporation$39K
Windstream Communications, LLC$7K$9K$10K$9K
Integration One, Inc.$4K$4K$5K$7K
Allied Wireless Communications Corporation$846$3K$3K$3K
AllTel Communications Inc$4K$3K$2K$1K
AT&T Mobility$503$763$3K$2K
BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.$6K

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.