Elk Point-Jefferson School District 61-7

Billed Entity 134070 · South Dakota

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$50K$7K$19K$19K$26K$5K$4K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$4K$5K$5K$6K$5K$6K$3K$20K$4K
Average discount rate50%60%60%60%50%50%60%62%60%60%60%57%57%55%55%56%60%57%57%52%50%50%53%
Schools & libraries (in this area)11111111
Service providers11113123112111122222144
Avg download speed (Mbps)
Avg upload speed (Mbps)

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$1K$293
Telecomm Services$4K$4K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K$4K$5K$5K$6K$5K$6K$3K$3K$4K
Internal Connections$50K$7K$19K$19K$25K$17K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Elk Point-Jefferson Elementary School$17K$224$239$183$12K$88$7K$9K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Elk Point-Jefferson Elementary SchoolElk Point50%3185149,85049,850Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Riverside Technologies, Inc.$50K$7K$19K$19K$17K
Clarity Telecom, LLC$5K$5K$5K$4K$5K$5K$6K$5K$6K$3K
Clarity Telecom, LLC$1K$5K$4K$5K$5K$5K
Norcom Advanced Technologies, Inc (Bergman Telecomm Div)$17K
High Plains Technology$8K
U S WEST Communications, Inc.$2K$3K
MCI Communications Corporation$1K
AllTel Communications$432$191$377
FirsTel, Inc$540
Verizon Wireless fka Cellco Partnership

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.