Custer School District 16-1

Billed Entity 134293 · South Dakota

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$8K$21K$77K$18K$31K$3K$20K$14K$21K$19K$19K$19K$21K$19K$14K$14K$13K$13K
Average discount rate60%60%70%70%70%10%38%50%70%66%65%65%66%65%64%61%64%65%59%
Schools & libraries (in this area)111111111
Service providers1111145456444433231
Avg download speed (Mbps)
Avg upload speed (Mbps)

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$3K$9K$14K
Telecomm Services$21K$19K$19K$19K$21K$19K$14K$14K$13K$13K
Internal Connections$8K$21K$77K$18K$31K$12K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Custer Elementary School$2K$6K$224$19K$183$5K$8K$733$5K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Custer Elementary SchoolCuster60%3079649,85049,850Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Golden West Technologies$21K$77K$18K$31K$12K
Golden West Telecommunications Cooperative, Inc.$1K$4K$7K$10K$10K$9K$10K$11K$10K$10K$9K$9K$9K
Verizon Business Global LLC$765$3K$4K$4K$4K$4K$4K$5K$4K
Fort Randall Telephone Company$286$852$1K$2K$3K$4K$4K$4K$3K$3K$3K
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$289$819$2K$4K$3K$2K
Riverside Technologies, Inc.$8K
Mt. Rushmore Tel. Co.$3K$4K
AT&T Mobility$435$2K$2K
AllTel Communications$1K$1K
South Dakota Network, LLC

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.