Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$626$658$774$860$1K$1K$1K$491$777$1K$987$868$893$886$893$880$854$809$451$784$881$619$1K$1K$612$890
Average discount rate90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%70%80%90%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%85%85%86%84%85%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers1111111111111111111222222222
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,000451515215101010
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,00045111511110

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$238$504
Telecomm Services$447$480$414$858$799$765$739$694$336$680$692$619$836$742$612$890
Internal Connections
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$626$658$774$860$1K$1K$1K$491$539$648$539$388$480$29$93$115$115$115$115$104$189$254$287
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
City Of Coalmont$626$626$658$860$860$2K$1K$1K$752$854

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
City Of CoalmontCoalmont90%1,0001,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Ben Lomand Rural Telephone Cooperative, Inc.$626$658$774$860$1K$1K$1K$491$777$1K$987$868$893$886$893$880$854$809$451$776$861$609$1K$1K$603$890
Ben Lomand Communications, Inc.$8$20$10$8$21$8
State of TN Finance & Admin OIR Tel.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.