Florence Crittenton Agency

Billed Entity 200967 · Tennessee

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$6K$13K$21K$22K$21K$22K$22K$24K$44K$43K$35K$43K$46K$46K$52K$77K$18K$23K
Average discount rate70%82%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1
Service providers232222344444438757
Avg download speed (Mbps)2
Avg upload speed (Mbps)2

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$2K$3K
Telecomm Services$21K$22K$21K$22K$22K$24K$39K$36K$28K$35K$34K$34K$30K$20K$18K$17K
Internal Connections$10K$50K$6K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$4K$3K$6K$8K$8K$8K$11K$11K$12K$6K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services$8K

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Florence Crittenton Agency$6K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Florence Crittenton AgencyKnoxville90%565622Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Verizon Wireless fka Cellco Partnership$10K$10K$13K$14K$13K$19K$25K$21K$15K$19K$20K$16K$7K
BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.$13K$16K$15K$16K$17K$22K$22K$13K$10K$11K
Sprint Spectrum, L.P.$3K$5K$5K$5K$6K$6K$7K$7K$8K$8K$7K$3K
EarthLink Business$3K$12K$12K$9K$7K$6K
Ferguson Electronics$3K$40K$1K
Network Technologies, Inc.$7K$10K$5K
CELERIS NETWORKS CONSULTING GROUP, LLC$8K
Metrocall, Inc.$725$2K$2K$2K
AT&T Corp.$3K$2K
Windstream Communications, LLC$6K

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.