Hamilton Parks Public Library

Billed Entity 209916 · Tennessee

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$560$672$1K$1K$912$912$912$989$1K$274$310$306$344$297$740$884$884$687$381$400$544$432
Average discount rate80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%50%60%60%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%70%68%72%72%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers11111111221111111211222222
Avg download speed (Mbps)300300100100100100100100100100
Avg upload speed (Mbps)10010077777777

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$125$208$274
Telecomm Services$310$306$344$297$321$404$404$476$381$400$354$259
Internal Connections
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$560$672$1K$1K$912$912$912$864$864$419$480$480$211$190$172
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Hamilton Parks Public Library$672$672$1K$1K$912$912$912$648$989$1K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Hamilton Parks Public LibraryTrimble80%75035Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Charter Communications Operating, LLC$560$672$1K$1K$912$912$912
Yorkville Telephone Cooperative$884$404$476$381$400$354$259
West Kentucky Rural Telephone Cooperative Corp Inc$125$208$274$310$306$344$297$740
Charter Communications$864$864
Yorkville Communications, Inc.$480$211
PCHNET Telecommunications, Inc.$190$172

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.