Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$72K$86K$85K$43K$43K$77K$77K$77K$96K$21K$4K$6K$6K$6K$6K$5K$5K$8K$3K$7K$5K$6K$6K$14K
Average discount rate80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%60%60%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers11111111231111112122242311
Avg download speed (Mbps)4,0004,0004,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000100
Avg upload speed (Mbps)4,0004,0004,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000100

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$3K$4K
Telecomm Services$6K$6K$6K$6K$5K$5K$5K$4K$5K$6K$6K$14K
Internal Connections$20K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$72K$86K$85K$43K$43K$77K$77K$77K$77K$18K$3K$3K$3K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
York Institute$86K$86K$86K$43K$43K$77K$77K$77K$96K$22K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
York InstituteJamestown80%4952675,0005,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
ENA Services, LLC$72K$86K$85K$43K$43K$77K$77K$77K$77K
Twin Lakes Telephone Cooperative Corporation$3K$4K$6K$6K$6K$6K$5K$5K$5K$4K$5K$6K$6K$14K
Personal Computer Systems, Inc$20K
AT&T Corp.$18K
Education Networks of America, Inc.$3K$3K$3K
Tennessee RSA No. 3 Limited Partnership dba U.S. Cellular
Verizon Wireless fka Cellco Partnership
BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC
Central Knox Inc
Tennessee Independent Telecom Group

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.