Christ The King School

Billed Entity 86256 · Texas — North

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$3K$3K$3K$4K$4K$4K$4K$8K$12K$12K$15K$18K$8K$13K$13K$11K$9K$9K$6K$390
Average discount rate40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%20%30%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers111222325443322222233
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,000200200200200200200
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,000200200200200200200

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$1K
Telecomm Services$4K$15K$18K$8K$8K$8K$6K$6K$6K$4K$390
Internal Connections
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$3K$3K$3K$4K$4K$4K$4K$8K$11K$8K$5K$5K$5K$3K$3K$1K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Christ The King School$4K$3K$3K$3K$7K$7K$8K$8K$8K$12K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Christ The King SchoolDallas40%480272,0002,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
WCI dba Logix Communications$1K$4K$3K$7K$7K$12K$12K$10K$8K$8K
Charter Communications Operating, LLC$3K$3K$3K$4K$4K$4K$4K
Time Warner Cable Business LLC$8K$11K$7K
Cogent Communications, Inc.$11K$11K
T-Mobile USA, Inc.$338$383$787$734$1K$1K$1K$769$769$769
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company$4K
Southwestern Bell Internet Services$1K
Cingular Wireless$390$390
eBackpack Inc$414
Netorch

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.