Bishop Thomas K. Gorman Catholic

Billed Entity 86803 · Texas — North

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$5K$9K$6K$19K$10K$8K$6K$6K$5K$3K$6K$9K$8K$9K$6K
Average discount rate50%50%40%40%40%40%45%40%40%40%30%40%40%40%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers121211111214444
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,5001,5001,5001,5002,0006002001007550
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,5001,5001,5001,5002,0006002001007550

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$1K
Telecomm Services$4K$3K$3K$4K
Internal Connections$2K$13K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$5K$7K$6K$6K$10K$8K$6K$6K$5K$3K$5K$5K$5K$5K$2K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Bishop Thomas K. Gorman Catholic$6K$9K$6K$20K$10K$8K$6K$6K$5K$27K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Bishop Thomas K. Gorman CatholicTyler50%210441,5001,500Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Cebridge Telecom TX, LP$5K$7K$6K$6K$10K$8K$6K$6K$5K$3K$6K$5K$5K$5K$2K
Tyler Communications Systems Inc.$2K$13K
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company$4K$2K$3K$4K
CordesTech LLC$570$640$280$600
SBC Long Distance, LLC.$240$383$213$170

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.