St Francis De Sales School

Billed Entity 88683 · Texas — South

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$4K$4K$4K$1K$5K$2K$2K$3K$6K$7K$9K$8K$8K$8K$3K$2K$1K$4K$5K$6K$6K$4K$6K$6K
Average discount rate40%40%40%40%40%40%40%50%50%40%33%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers111111122233333332212222223
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0002502501001008885
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0002502501001008822

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$2K
Telecomm Services$4K$5K$6K$6K$6K$6K$875$700$1K$4K$4K$3K$4K$4K$4K$6K
Internal Connections
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$4K$4K$4K$1K$5K$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$3K$2K$2K$2K$2K$1K$2K$2K$3K$2K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
St Francis De Sales School$4K$4K$4K$5K$5K$5K$1K$16K$2K$2K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
St Francis De Sales SchoolHouston40%254451,0001,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
XO Communications, Inc$2K$4K$5K$6K$5K$5K$5K
Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P.$790$878$876$875$700$1K$4K$4K$3K$4K$4K$4K$4K
The University of Texas-Austin$1K$780$676$624$757$867$2K$2K$2K$2K$2K$1K$2K$2K$3K$2K$2K
AT&T Corp.$1K$3K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$2K
EM3 Networks LLC$4K$4K$4K
SchoolVision of Texas, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.