Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$29K$46K$29K$20K$24K$18K$20K$65K$37K$36K$40K$61K$26K$25K$23K$18K$21K
Average discount rate65%70%70%70%70%70%70%75%57%57%59%70%70%70%70%70%70%70%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers112111114445555458
Avg download speed (Mbps)2,0002,0002,0001,5001,5001,3331,0001,0001,0001,000
Avg upload speed (Mbps)2,0002,0002,0001,5001,5001,3331,0001,0001,0001,000

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$1K$5K$9K
Telecomm Services$27K$40K$61K$26K$25K$23K$18K$21K
Internal Connections$15K$36K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$29K$29K$29K$20K$24K$18K$20K$28K$32K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$2K
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Wasatch Academy$21K$38K$49K$30K$21K$34K$28K$31K$66K$41K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Wasatch AcademyMount Pleasant50%145142,0002,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Central Utah Telephone Inc.$29K$29K$29K$20K$24K$18K$20K$29K$35K$31K$33K$54K$15K$14K$14K$14K$14K
Dynamic Integrations, LLC$17K$36K
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$369$1K$4K$5K$5K$8K$8K$6K$906$3K
Level 3 Communications, LLC$97$531$902$1K$1K$2K$2K$2K$2K$3K
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC - CONSOLIDATED$359$519$837$941$1K$1K$1K$1K
Apple Computer, Inc
CDW-G
Central Communications, Inc.
WhippleHill Communications, Inc.
Jive Communications, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.