King William School District
Overview
| Indicator | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total E-Rate subsidies | — | $32K | $34K | $29K | $37K | $57K | $51K | $348K | $49K | $32K | — | $66K | $82K | $71K | $70K | $79K | $76K | $71K | $71K | $41K | $40K | $36K | $33K | $22K | — | — | — | $36K |
| Average discount rate | 70% | 70% | 70% | 60% | 60% | 60% | 60% | 63% | 70% | 40% | 62% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 63% | 60% | 60% | 60% | 60% | 62% | 60% | 60% | 60% | — | — | — | 60% |
| Schools & libraries (in this area) | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Service providers | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | — | — | — | 6 |
| Avg download speed (Mbps) | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,500 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 800 | 200 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Avg upload speed (Mbps) | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,500 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 800 | 200 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Subsidies by E-Rate service type
| Service type | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voice | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $3K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Telecomm Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $20K | $27K | $27K | $30K | $47K | $45K | $44K | $48K | $37K | $40K | $36K | $33K | $22K | — | — | — | $36K |
| Internal Connections | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Data Transmission and/or Internet Access | — | $32K | $34K | $29K | $37K | $57K | $51K | $348K | $49K | $29K | — | $45K | $55K | $44K | $40K | $32K | $30K | $27K | $23K | $4K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Managed Internal Broadband Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution
| Recipient | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acquinton Elementary School | $13K | $14K | $3K | $7K | $11K | $14K | $13K | $86K | $12K | $7K |
| Cool Spring Primary School | $13K | $14K | $3K | $7K | $11K | $14K | $13K | $86K | $12K | $7K |
| Hamilton Holmes Middle School | $13K | $14K | $10K | $7K | $11K | $14K | $13K | $86K | $12K | $11K |
| King William High School | $14K | $14K | $17K | $7K | $11K | $14K | $13K | $91K | $12K | $17K |
Recipient demographics
| Recipient | City | Discount Rate | Students | NSLP | Down Mbps | Up Mbps | Urban/Rural |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acquinton Elementary School | King William | 70% | 451 | 204 | 1,000 | 1,000 | Rural |
| Cool Spring Primary School | King William | 70% | 526 | 240 | 1,000 | 1,000 | Rural |
| Hamilton Holmes Middle School | King William | 70% | 463 | 203 | 1,000 | 1,000 | Rural |
| King William High School | King William | 70% | 677 | 257 | 10,000 | 10,000 | Rural |
Subsidies by service provider (top 10)
| Service provider | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lumos Networks, Inc. | — | $32K | $34K | $29K | $37K | $57K | $51K | $334K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Verizon Business Global LLC | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $14K | $49K | $29K | — | $42K | $47K | $38K | $34K | $32K | $15K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Verizon South Incorporated | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $30K | $33K | $31K | $28K | $28K | $28K | $14K | — | — | — | $27K |
| Verizon-Virginia, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $8K | $16K | $18K | $16K | $37K | $36K | $3K | — | — | $2K | — | — | $2K | — | — | — | $6K |
| AT&T Corporation | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $3K | — | $11K | $8K | $8K | $8K | $7K | $5K | $9K | $9K | $2K | $6K | $4K | $5K | $3K | — | — | — | $2K |
| Bowling Green Electronics | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $4K | $6K | $6K | — | $15K | $27K | $23K | $4K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Verizon Wireless fka Cellco Partnership | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $845 | $2K | — | $6K | $3K | $4K | $3K | $6K | $5K | $4K | $4K | — | $4K | — | — | — | — |
| IndexBlue, Inc | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $4K | $4K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Virginia Cellular Limited Partnership | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1K |
| Sprint Communications Co. L.P. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.