New Glarus School District

Billed Entity 132983 · Wisconsin

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$60K$88K$1K$6K$2K$16K$9K$8K$3K$10K$10K$3K$11K$6K$3K
Average discount rate50%60%60%60%60%59%59%60%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%
Schools & libraries (in this area)22222
Service providers312514565444433333
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,000500400
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,000500400

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice
Telecomm Services$8K$6K$5K$5K$5K$7K$2K
Internal Connections$57K$84K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$3K$5K$1K$6K$2K$8K$3K$3K$3K$4K$4K$3K$4K$4K$3K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
New Glarus Elementary School$20K$6K$4K$41K
New Glarus Middle School$20K$6K$4K$36K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
New Glarus Elementary SchoolNew Glarus50%419831,0001,000Rural
New Glarus Middle SchoolNew Glarus50%214371,0001,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Paragon Development Systems Inc.$84K
Skyward, Inc.$43K
WiscNet$3K$5K$2K$3K$3K$3K$3K$3K$3K$3K$4K$4K$3K
Mt. Vernon Telephone Company, LLC DBA TDS Telecom$7K$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K
Integral Building Systems, Inc.$14K
Active Internet Technologies, LLC$5K
Charter Communications$4K
AT&T Corp.$2K$2K
Gaggle.net, Inc.$1K$2K
Midwest Internet Consulting Group, Inc$1K$1K

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.