Lena Public School District

Billed Entity 133148 · Wisconsin

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$4K$25K$39K$11K$8K$3K$4K$4K$6K$5K$5K$6K$5K$5K$5K$5K$3K$3K$2K
Average discount rate70%70%70%70%60%70%40%57%60%68%68%68%63%62%60%60%57%57%56%57%60%57%58%
Schools & libraries (in this area)222
Service providers13221233211111111112216
Avg download speed (Mbps)4004001,000
Avg upload speed (Mbps)4004001,000

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$2K$3K
Telecomm Services$4K$4K$6K$5K$5K$6K$5K$5K$5K$5K$3K$3K$2K
Internal Connections$20K$39K$11K$6K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$4K$6K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Lena Elementary School$2K$8K$2K
Lena Middle School$2K$8K$2K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Lena Elementary SchoolLena70%18071400400Rural
Lena Middle SchoolLena70%11544400400Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
AMCO HBS Holdings LP$20K$39K$11K$6K
CenturyTel of the Midwest-Wisconsin, LLC$2K$3K$4K$4K$6K$5K$5K$6K$5K$5K$5K$5K$3K$3K$2K
WiscNet$4K$6K
AT&T Corp.
Bayland Tel. Inc.
Camera Corner Inc.
Anixter Inc.
Scheffen Electric
Unitel, Inc.
Vos Electric, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.