Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$10K$12K$14K$39K$70K$35K$25K$12K$9K$13K$15K$10K$10K$10K$14K$14K$8K$10K
Average discount rate60%60%60%60%60%60%60%50%50%18%43%50%50%60%50%50%50%60%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers111323343462233211
Avg download speed (Mbps)2,0002,0002,0002,0002,0001,5001,0001,000500500
Avg upload speed (Mbps)2,0002,0002,0002,0002,0001,5001,0001,000500500

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$493$2K
Telecomm Services$2K$3K$3K$3K$3K
Internal Connections$20K$49K$13K$4K$3K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$10K$12K$14K$19K$20K$19K$15K$8K$9K$12K$12K$8K$8K$8K$10K$10K$8K$10K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$1K$3K$6K
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Pius Xi High School$11K$12K$14K$39K$70K$46K$25K$16K$9K$13K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Pius Xi High SchoolMilwaukee60%7583345,0005,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Charter Communications Operating, LLC$10K$12K$14K$19K$20K$19K$15K$8K
Time Warner Cable Business LLC$9K$12K$12K$8K$8K$8K$10K$10K$8K$10K
Sentinel Technologies, Inc.$10K$50K$14K
CDW Government LLC$11K$2K$4K
US Xchange of Wisconsin LLC$2K$2K$3K$3K$3K$3K
SynerComm Inc.$6K$3K
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$226$186
Windstream Communications, LLC$268
Dell Marketing LP
Trivad, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.