St Clement Elementary School

Billed Entity 61864 · Wisconsin

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$654$654$2K$414$5K$439$1K$492$1K$601$539
Average discount rate50%50%50%50%50%50%50%37%50%50%50%50%50%50%60%50%50%60%60%60%60%60%
Schools & libraries (in this area)11111111
Service providers1131121211111111111242
Avg download speed (Mbps)2502502507575755050
Avg upload speed (Mbps)5050503030302020

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice
Telecomm Services$754$492$901$496$424
Internal Connections$2K$5K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$654$654$414$414$439$414$226$105$115
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
St Clement Elementary School$654$654$3K$414$414$5K$445$2K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
St Clement Elementary SchoolLancaster50%1071125050Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
The Farmers Telephone Company, LLC DBA TDS Telecom$654$654$414$414$439$1K$492$1K$483$403
CDW Government LLC$5K
AMCO HBS Holdings LP$2K
Excel Telecommunications, Inc.$109$118$136
Ampro Data Services, Inc.
Heartland Technology Group, Inc.
Applied Micro Technologies, Inc.
SHI International Corpo.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.