Freeland Community School District

Billed Entity 131105 · Michigan

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$155K$100K$2K$5K$2K$4K$8K$8K$7K$7K$10K
Average discount rate60%40%20%43%45%45%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)111111111
Service providers2122222323312331
Avg download speed (Mbps)
Avg upload speed (Mbps)

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$2K
Telecomm Services$5K$2K$4K$8K$8K$7K$7K$10K
Internal Connections$155K$100K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Freeland Middle School-High School$5K$129$110$124$2K$1K$1K$1K$51K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Freeland Middle School-High SchoolFreeland60%839166200,000200,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Moss Telecommunications Services$140K$100K
SBC Michigan$504$2K$2K$4K$7K$7K$7K$568$190
Windstream Communications, Inc.$1K$3K$6K$9K
Vector Tech Group$15K
SBC Long Distance, LLC.$51$197$214
AllTel Communications$74$108$96
Verizon Wireless$68
Qwest Communications Corporation
MCI Communications Corporation
CenturyTel of Michigan, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.